The creators of Diablo spoke about Blizzard and how it\u2019s changed since they were on board.\r\n\r\nThe founders of Blizzard North, David Brevik, and brothers Erich and Max Schaefer spoke to PC Gamer\u2019s Steven Messner about the \u201cBlizzard Empire.\u201d\r\n\r\nBrevik told Messner that Blizzard has completely changed since they were there.\r\n\r\n"When we quit, there was like 180 employees total. There's thousands now. The whole empire is different, and Activision didn't have any influence. At that point, it was just Blizzard and then some anonymous corporate owner, Vivendi, or whoever. That was it. And so now [Blizzard is] a video game empire that has to appease \r\nshareholders and all that sort of stuff."\r\n\r\nThis is a well-known private company vs. public corporation dichotomy. When a company becomes a publicly-traded company, the amount of equity they can pull in is immense, especially if they are a promising game developer like Blizzard Entertainment.\r\n\r\nSo, Blizzard got all this equity money to use on creating more games by increasing the number of employees, building more offices, and raising salaries. However, a product of that is appeasing shareholders that are expecting management to do everything they can to maximize profit.\r\n\r\nThe first thing one learns about having a publicly-traded company is that every action made must benefit the shareholder.\r\n\r\nBrevik mentions to Messner that what\u2019s happened with Blizzard is something that happens to virtually every company that grows into a large company. Back when the three were on board working for Blizzard\u2019s subsidiary Blizzard North, they never talked about shareholders. Furthermore, they didn\u2019t talk about the Chinese government and how they would be impacted by the decisions the company makes.\r\n\r\nThe most significant controversy with Blizzard this year is <a href="https:\/\/happygamer.com\/blizzard-suspends-hearthstone-player-for-supporting-hong-kong-also-takes-away-prize-money-29126\/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">their handling of blitzchung<\/a>, a professional esports gamer who made a pro-Hong Kong statement at a Blizzard ran esports event, which was being live-streamed.\r\n\r\nWith blitzchung\u2019s banning, many gamers and critics alike viewed this decision by Blizzard as a clear indication they were operating with Chinese money and that they had pressure from the Chinese government to silence blitzchung.\r\n\r\nBrevik thinks this is a conspiracy theory, and he believes that the real reason why is because of the enormous corporate nature of Blizzard.\r\nBlizzard was in a no-win situation, Brevik believes.\r\n\r\nBlizzard president J. Allen Brack clarified his position on the blitzchung matter after Blizzcon 2019, and he reiterated that the reason they suspended blitzchung was to avoid Blizzard esports events becoming politicized. \r\n\r\nHere is the apology at Blizzcon 2019 and notice that blitzchung was never directly referenced, which created some controversy of its own.\r\n\r\nhttps:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xaa3O3IT97I\r\n\r\nBrevik understands the move because if Blizzard didn\u2019t do anything, then its esports events would become an incubator for free speech, and any random political movement at an event could follow.\r\n\r\nShareholders do not want politics in a gaming company. As an owner of the business, stockholders\u2019 value anything that will bring more money into the business, and in Blizzard\u2019s eyes, the objectively divisive statement from blitzchung would do the opposite of that.\r\n\r\n\u201cThey had to do something, but was it perfectly handled? Probably not. I mean, that's why they apologized,\u201d Brevik said.\r\n\r\nBlizzard has been hit hard because of the blitzchung controversy, including <a href="https:\/\/happygamer.com\/blizzard-loses-sponsor-mitsubishi-taiwan-after-banning-gamer-for-making-pro-hong-kong-statement-32275\/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">losing sponsorship<\/a>, <a href="https:\/\/happygamer.com\/protests-have-been-going-on-all-day-outside-of-blizzcon-rallying-against-hong-kong-controversy-33778\/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">protests<\/a>, and the <a href="https:\/\/happygamer.com\/blizzard-vice-president-and-overwatch-director-jeff-kaplan-does-not-agree-with-the-companys-decision-to-ban-blitzchung-over-hong-kong-controversy-37059\/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">contradiction of executives<\/a>.\r\n\r\nWhat was Blizzard North?\r\n\r\nBlizzard North was the Bay area branch of Blizzard Entertainment, and it was founded back in 1993. The original name was Condor, but Blizzard Entertainment purchased the company and subsequently renamed Blizzard North.\r\n\r\nThe games that came out of Blizzard North are Diablo, Diablo 2, and the expansion Diablo 2: Lord of Destruction. NFL Quarterback Club \u201895, Justice League Task Force, and NFL Quarterback \u201996 were developed under Condor.\r\n\r\nIn 2003, when Blizzard North was working on Diablo 3, there was an exodus of employees, including Brevik and the Schaefer brothers. A determining factor for why the three left was the corporate nature of Blizzard, becoming so big that it was becoming so focused on share holders.\r\n\r\nBlizzard North was closed in 2005, and Blizzard Entertainment scrapped and restarted Diablo 3.\r\n\r\nHead over to PC Gamer to read the entire interview between Steve Messner and the three founders.